Szerző dc.contributor.author | Korhecz Tamás | |
Szerző dc.contributor.author | Nagy Noémi | |
Elérhetőség dátuma dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-20T13:36:32Z | |
Rendelkezésre állás dátuma dc.date.available | 2024-02-20T13:36:32Z | |
Kiadás dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
Issn dc.identifier.issn | 1465-3923 | |
Issn dc.identifier.issn | 0090-5992 | |
Uri dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12944/21356 | |
Kivonat dc.description.abstract | The minority question has long been a hot topic in Central and Eastern Europe. Whereas most CEE countries guarantee the privileged position of the dominant nation, they also recognize the existence of national minorities and provide special rights for them. Hence there is an apparent contradiction between the values of the nation-states: unity and diversity. This article proposes that to resolve this contradiction, it is necessary to define the concept, scope and limitations of group-specific minority rights, as well as their relationship with other human rights and the nation-state. Constitutional courts are appropriate candidates for this task. However, based on our analysis of the relevant constitutional jurisprudence of five CEE countries – Croatia, Hungary, Romania, Serbia, and Slovenia – it seems that constitutional courts in the region have failed to properly conceptualize minority rights. Instead of developing appropriate tests for assessing the constitutionality of legal regulations, they have only superficially touched upon the conceptual issues of minority rights, using incidental, case-by-case arguments to justify the (un)constitutionality of the legal provisions. Therefore, this article also attempts to outline a constitutionality test that may be suitable for constitutional courts to consistently evaluate submissions that challenge the constitutionality of laws on minority rights. | |
Nyelv dc.language | en | |
Kulcsszó dc.subject | national minorities | |
Kulcsszó dc.subject | conceptualization of minority rights | |
Kulcsszó dc.subject | CEE region | |
Kulcsszó dc.subject | constitutional courts | |
Kulcsszó dc.subject | constitutionality tests | |
Cím dc.title | The Achilles Heel of Constitutional Jurisprudence: Conceptualization of Minority Rights by Constitutional Courts in Central and Eastern Europe | |
Típus dc.type | folyóiratcikk | |
Változtatás dátuma dc.date.updated | 2024-02-08T14:41:25Z | |
Változat dc.description.version | kiadói | |
Hozzáférés dc.rights.accessRights | nyílt hozzáférésű | |
Doi azonosító dc.identifier.doi | 10.1017/nps.2023.94 | |
Tudományág dc.subject.discipline | Társadalomtudományok | |
Tudományterület dc.subject.sciencebranch | Társadalomtudományok/Állam- és jogtudományok | |
Mtmt azonosító dc.identifier.mtmt | 34442032 | |
Folyóirat dc.identifier.journalTitle | Nationalities Papers | |
Évfolyam dc.identifier.journalVolume | 2023 | |
Terjedelem dc.format.page | 24 | |
Scopus azonosító dc.identifier.scopus | 85180090861 | |
Folyóiratcím rövidítve dc.identifier.journalAbbreviatedTitle | NATL PAPERS | |
Kiadás éve dc.description.issuedate | 2023 | |
Szerző intézménye dc.contributor.department | Nemzetközi Jogi Tanszék |